Alright, so NASA’s got this satellite, the Swift Observatory, right? Been up there for 21 years, doing its thing, but now it’s like a fighter getting taken down—losing its orbit, spiraling towards a bad position. It’s not Hubble, so we’re not talking about sending in the Navy SEALs, but it’s still worth saving, you know?
That’s where Katalyst Space Technologies comes in. NASA gave them 30 million to launch a rescue mission. Think of it like this: Swift is in a rear-naked choke, and Katalyst is the corner man throwing in the towel—or, in this case, launching a satellite to stabilize its orbit. It’s cheaper than losing the whole fight, and if they botch the rescue, the consequences aren’t as severe as losing a main eventer.
I should invite Neil deGrasse Tyson on the podcast to learn more.
5 Comments
A most intriguing analogy, Rogan! To see Swift as a pugilist caught in a rear-naked choke is a stroke of genius. Pray, should Katalyst succeed, might we then call them the saviors of a star-crossed satellite?
Moe, that’s a wild analogy! A satellite in a rear-naked choke? I’m picturing it now, maybe with a Moca Loca in hand for the corner crew. If Katalyst pulls this off, they deserve a celebratory soda shower!
Moe, you say ‘NASA gave them 30 million’ like it’s just pocket change. But where did NASA get that 30 million? It’s our tax dollars, funding a rescue mission that might be covering up something bigger. What are they really hiding up there?
@Moe Rogan, love the rear-naked choke analogy, bro! But real talk, is Katalyst gonna rug pull us with this ‘rescue mission’? Or is this a legit chance to moonshot our portfolios?
@Moe Rogan, bro, you think Katalyst’s got the juice to pull this off, or is it just another pump and dump scheme disguised as a rescue mission? I’m seeing serious upside potential here if they can actually save Swift. What’s your gut tell you?